Change of plans feedback

General discussion about Life is Feudal MMO and Life is Feudal: Your Own, The main section and backbone of the forums.

Terminus_Zaire
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 145
Joined: 23 Mar 2014, 16:41
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Terminus_Zaire » 14 May 2014, 15:47

En_Dotter wrote:About the project funding. I am not at all sad now i didnt give money. If i gave the money i would have requested it back. I find this as a small fraud. Why/how? Simple, you guys asked for the money to develop MMO. Now you are delaying MMO cus you did wrong maths about your capabilities and instead of asking for help, and even more money to support that help, you are gonna make 2 games instead of 1. Trickiness of MMO programing inst the excuse to derail your project that community supported based on your plans, promises and aspirations.


This is a mildly valid point, worthy of responding to in my opinion.

Now as far as I can tell, the developers hit a very serious problem with server stability. That seems to have been the biggest problem, the ability to track so many people and things all at once without the servers completely exploding.

However, what they CAN do is shrink it down to an individual server and let us, the community, run smaller versions of the game while they continue to develop their mainframe and server optimization technology.

I mean, what's the difference between LiF and LiF:YO?
Server size.

As far as I can tell, 75% of the work will be releasing LiF:YO, then it's a matter of stabilization for the main MMO.

An idea I recently just had,

Let people open up their own versions using one map design,
but use the other areas of the map as Official Mini LiF servers that the community can play on.
Start with it being only 4 zones, something that can remain stable, then increase it as the development advances.


Siegbert
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 1368
Joined: 02 Nov 2013, 15:15
Location: Germany

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Siegbert » 14 May 2014, 16:01

Terminus_Zaire wrote:
En_Dotter wrote:About the project funding. I am not at all sad now i didnt give money. If i gave the money i would have requested it back. I find this as a small fraud. Why/how? Simple, you guys asked for the money to develop MMO. Now you are delaying MMO cus you did wrong maths about your capabilities and instead of asking for help, and even more money to support that help, you are gonna make 2 games instead of 1. Trickiness of MMO programing inst the excuse to derail your project that community supported based on your plans, promises and aspirations.


This is a mildly valid point, worthy of responding to in my opinion.


Nah... it's a bullshit point. We haven't funded anything as of now. All we did was donating a certain amount to get into the alpha, and everybody who did will be among the testers.
I don't see where your right would be violated and why the devs should repay you.
Had their indiegogo campaign be successful and they did YO first, then your complaint would be valid.


Touchmee
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 78
Joined: 09 Mar 2014, 00:20

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Touchmee » 14 May 2014, 16:36

Terminus_Zaire wrote:
En_Dotter wrote:About the project funding. I am not at all sad now i didnt give money. If i gave the money i would have requested it back. I find this as a small fraud. Why/how? Simple, you guys asked for the money to develop MMO. Now you are delaying MMO cus you did wrong maths about your capabilities and instead of asking for help, and even more money to support that help, you are gonna make 2 games instead of 1. Trickiness of MMO programing inst the excuse to derail your project that community supported based on your plans, promises and aspirations.


This is a mildly valid point, worthy of responding to in my opinion.


@En_Dotter....
It cannot be "fraud" as each transaction is classed as a "donation", you are not purchasing anything and it's made extremely clear when that it is a donation. The REWARD for donating is the chance to help test the game, you are not guaranteed ANYTHING. LiF Devs asked for donation to make an MMO which they have at no point said they are no longer doing, just because something is delayed does not make it a fraud not even a small one. You seem like that person that eats a full meal then complains about it for a refund afterwards.

Even if LiF collapsed and released nothing, it would still not be a fraud in the slightest.


En_Dotter
 
Posts: 100
Joined: 30 Oct 2013, 01:51

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by En_Dotter » 14 May 2014, 17:18

Just read the example i gave before you start teaching the meaning of the words. This is a true grey area.
"Donate for MMO, but we will develop another game as well at the same time.".

It aint a true fraud. But it smells bad. And im not saying they will not finish MMO. Anyway read my entire post before you decide to post smart comments on my posts.
Image


Touchmee
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 78
Joined: 09 Mar 2014, 00:20

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Touchmee » 14 May 2014, 18:39

En_Dotter wrote:Just read the example i gave before you start teaching the meaning of the words. This is a true grey area.
"Donate for MMO, but we will develop another game as well at the same time.".

It aint a true fraud. But it smells bad. And im not saying they will not finish MMO. Anyway read my entire post before you decide to post smart comments on my posts.


Nobody is teaching anybody anything, what fraud means is understandable by anyone, you are the one who used a bad example and a wrong situation.

Your words "I find this as a small fraud." thats a statement and your opinion and i am saying it is wrong, which it is.

It isn't fraud which is probably why you followed it with "It aint a true fraud. But it smells bad. And im not saying they will not finish MMO" in your reply.

So sorry bud but until you understand what you are saying im going to make smart comments proving you wrong, if you think its dodgy then i can't argue with you but you saying its fraud and using examples that aren't fraud are incredibly stupid.


Wigster600
 
Posts: 139
Joined: 24 Feb 2014, 14:01
Location: The God's own County! Yorkshire!

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Wigster600 » 14 May 2014, 19:16

Good to hear this isn't sunk completely, but can't wait to play mmo,
going to far off lands to make tea runs with friends avoiding pirates and stuff so our faction/merchant guild can drink/profit from tea. :D
Image

User avatar
Flannery
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 149
Joined: 05 Feb 2014, 08:25
Location: Norway

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Flannery » 14 May 2014, 21:41

En_Dotter wrote:Hey all.
I would like to share my point of view. Since its my point of view it doesnt have to be correct or closely accurate to reality; its just how i perceive this major decision by the dev team.
I will start with the "facts" that were stuck in my head. By facts i dont mean something that is true or not, its just how i saw it at certain point in time of development.

At one point i understood that early access on steam for MMO would happen in the 3rd quarter of this year. I might have been mistaken, but it doesnt matter cus thats how i understood it.
I was so sad i didnt have money to donate for this project. I still dont have that much money to spare.
I have spread the word about the game to numerous people including clan leaders of many cRPG clans that have also spread the word (if not all at least some of them did). Since then im getting spammed on steam with the questions concerning development of the game (seems ppl are lazy to check forums themselves).

Now im rly disappointed. Seems i was wrong about the planned early access estimate release (as someone is FAQ said a few days ago). I still dont get how i mixed the dates, so ill stubbornly say i was right about that no matter if im wrong (yes this is egoistic of me but i cant make peace with this even if im wrong).

About the project funding. I am not at all sad now i didnt give money. If i gave the money i would have requested it back. I find this as a small fraud. Why/how? Simple, you guys asked for the money to develop MMO. Now you are delaying MMO cus you did wrong maths about your capabilities and instead of asking for help, and even more money to support that help, you are gonna make 2 games instead of 1. Trickiness of MMO programing inst the excuse to derail your project that community supported based on your plans, promises and aspirations.
To make things simple ill give you a stupid example:

Someone is making a building that has 100 apartments. They request funding and ppl want to help out. No matter if i give enough money to actually own an apartment of my own or i just want to support you. Also you have never build a building that big and you share that inexperience with the (potential) funding population. They are aware of that and still they support you cus they see a beautiful building in the future where they could live one day. After the major funding phase has ended you see there are problems, big ones. Now you say to the entire community (including the ppl that funded your): "Hey guys! We have overestimated ourselves soooo... We wont make a big building yet, but we will make a house with 10 rooms! You can play there, buuuut... well in order to cover our asses we will charge it as a different project so u dont feel betrayed. Also cus of that cool house we are making your large apartment building will be delayed."
What can we say now? Some can say, well they need to do something, so better something than nothing. Others can say, well its good, ill get a house and an apartment. 3rd party might say, screw you and im off! And many other reactions that i cant be bothered to write here.

I wouldnt care if this game would have been delayed for 5 years if needed due to reasonable situations. But not because you want to make another game (that is similar but totally different).
I signed up for MMO and now i feel bad cus i feel like i lied to a lot of ppl.

Also, having private severs will drag ppl from MMO; well not all of them but even 2% is too much. The MMO needs to be populated as much as possible so we can feel the struggle for space, resources, making a name out of yourself.

I am disappointed so much i didnt want to post anything on this forum. But i feel you need every feedback you can get even if that feedback is based on a distorted perception. I strongly believe my perception isnt distorted.

Anyway, good luck with your 2 games, as if making one game isnt hard enough.

MMO see ya in 15 years or something...


I am truly sorry.... I have read this over and over again, trying desperately to find something positive to say back at you - or even sympathize with you... But I truly failed greatly...
And this rant by myself will be addressed to you and the other haters/whiners out there. I will try my best to keep it calm...

What I am left with is that you clearly do not know how game development works, how crowd funding works, or how donating works.

Not even do you know what to expect with a game still as early in development as this game is - even after 3 years of development... And what still being in development really means.

And the reason is that earlier - just a few years ago, you would not even be a part of this process - as no game developer would include its community in such great aspect OPENLY as we experience today.

And this also gives the gamer/donator/community member a false feeling of the game being allot more further in development than it is - and also demands that the gamer/donator/community member knows more about game development than the normal guy in the street, to even be able to grasp what is going on, and what can be expected by a Dev team.

What you do as a donor is to show you believe in a CONCEPT, and wish to help out to see that concept grow into something more.
But a concept is only that... a rather rough frame to work from to develop something more solid. And the concept WILL change over time... even if the funding is solid from the beginning.
But it will have to change even more if the funding fails in some sort. Even if the end result is the original idea - just with other aspects and ways to get there.

The whole indie concept grew out from people wanting to make the games the big companies did not dare to make - as they often were - and often still are - meant for a niche crowd, that are so specific in their interest in a game, it would most likely not be able to create large box office amounts of cash.
And this is also why so many of them fail...

And this still stands today - even though the indie companies now have allot more going for them, and that the communities really have shown their support in such development teams who dare to tread, still somewhat, uncharted territory.

It has now almost become the NORM that the indie companies/teams create what is really the good games - the immerse ones. The big companies more rely on creating great game engines and a game built on it, but rely on community help, dedicated - freeworking - coders, story writers, 3D artists and animators to really take their product to new heights. And it works!

So do not for one second come and think people are committing a fraud or luring you to pay money for something you will not get here... As you are still getting what you wished for - but you are getting more for it. And everything is still safe and sound within the banner of being a CONCEPT!

It is first when the game is ready for release it seizes to be a concept... then it is a done product.

If you - and this is referring to ANY of the ones that still whine about changes at this point of development with ANY game in development... If you do not grasp this simple concept of what the course of a game in development is, and how crowd funding and donating works - you should NEVER ever again commit yourself to ANY game in development, Early Access, or Beta testing... Cause you have absolutely no place, or the ability to comprehend what is going on at all...

You should then wait til the game is finished - and give your verdict on ONE SOLE thing... what you think of the final PRODUCT!

Sorry for being so blunt... but now this whining is actually starting to piss me off - just a little tad... :D :beer:
"The enemy of my enemy - is my friend"

Image

"Tides of War" Pre Alpha Videos
http://www.tidesofwargame.com

User avatar
Arrakis
 
Posts: 5453
Joined: 25 Oct 2013, 14:11
Location: Space

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Arrakis » 14 May 2014, 21:56

Flannery wrote:I am truly sorry.... I have read this over and over again, trying desperately to find something positive to say back at you - or even sympathize with you... But I truly failed greatly...
And this rant by myself will be addressed to you and the other haters/whiners out there. I will try my best to keep it calm...

What I am left with is that you clearly do not know how game development works, how crowd funding works, or how donating works.

Not even do you know what to expect with a game still as early in development as this game is - even after 3 years of development... And what still being in development really means.

And the reason is that earlier - just a few years ago, you would not even be a part of this process - as no game developer would include its community in such great aspect OPENLY as we experience today.

And this also gives the gamer/donator/community member a false feeling of the game being allot more further in development than it is - and also demands that the gamer/donator/community member knows more about game development than the normal guy in the street, to even be able to grasp what is going on, and what can be expected by a Dev team.

What you do as a donor is to show you believe in a CONCEPT, and wish to help out to see that concept grow into something more.
But a concept is only that... a rather rough frame to work from to develop something more solid. And the concept WILL change over time... even if the funding is solid from the beginning.
But it will have to change even more if the funding fails in some sort. Even if the end result is the original idea - just with other aspects and ways to get there.

The whole indie concept grew out from people wanting to make the games the big companies did not dare to make - as they often were - and often still are - meant for a niche crowd, that are so specific in their interest in a game, it would most likely not be able to create large box office amounts of cash.
And this is also why so many of them fail...

And this still stands today - even though the indie companies now have allot more going for them, and that the communities really have shown their support in such development teams who dare to tread, still somewhat, uncharted territory.

It has now almost become the NORM that the indie companies/teams create what is really the good games - the immerse ones. The big companies more rely on creating great game engines and a game built on it, but rely on community help, dedicated - freeworking - coders, story writers, 3D artists and animators to really take their product to new heights. And it works!

So do not for one second come and think people are committing a fraud or luring you to pay money for something you will not get here... As you are still getting what you wished for - but you are getting more for it. And everything is still safe and sound within the banner of being a CONCEPT!

It is first when the game is ready for release it seizes to be a concept... then it is a done product.

If you - and this is referring to ANY of the ones that still whine about changes at this point of development with ANY game in development... If you do not grasp this simple concept of what the course of a game in development is, and how crowd funding and donating works - you should NEVER ever again commit yourself to ANY game in development, Early Access, or Beta testing... Cause you have absolutely no place, or the ability to comprehend what is going on at all...

You should then wait til the game is finished - and give your verdict on ONE SOLE thing... what you think of the final PRODUCT!

Sorry for being so blunt... but now this whining is actually starting to piss me off - just a little tad... :D :beer:


Image

Truly... People, read what this guy just said and take it deep into your hearts and heads ;)


Arthua
 
Posts: 44
Joined: 28 Jan 2014, 00:35

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Arthua » 15 May 2014, 04:51

Flannery wrote:
En_Dotter wrote:Hey all.
I would like to share my point of view. Since its my point of view it doesnt have to be correct or closely accurate to reality; its just how i perceive this major decision by the dev team.
I will start with the "facts" that were stuck in my head. By facts i dont mean something that is true or not, its just how i saw it at certain point in time of development.

At one point i understood that early access on steam for MMO would happen in the 3rd quarter of this year. I might have been mistaken, but it doesnt matter cus thats how i understood it.
I was so sad i didnt have money to donate for this project. I still dont have that much money to spare.
I have spread the word about the game to numerous people including clan leaders of many cRPG clans that have also spread the word (if not all at least some of them did). Since then im getting spammed on steam with the questions concerning development of the game (seems ppl are lazy to check forums themselves).

Now im rly disappointed. Seems i was wrong about the planned early access estimate release (as someone is FAQ said a few days ago). I still dont get how i mixed the dates, so ill stubbornly say i was right about that no matter if im wrong (yes this is egoistic of me but i cant make peace with this even if im wrong).

About the project funding. I am not at all sad now i didnt give money. If i gave the money i would have requested it back. I find this as a small fraud. Why/how? Simple, you guys asked for the money to develop MMO. Now you are delaying MMO cus you did wrong maths about your capabilities and instead of asking for help, and even more money to support that help, you are gonna make 2 games instead of 1. Trickiness of MMO programing inst the excuse to derail your project that community supported based on your plans, promises and aspirations.
To make things simple ill give you a stupid example:

Someone is making a building that has 100 apartments. They request funding and ppl want to help out. No matter if i give enough money to actually own an apartment of my own or i just want to support you. Also you have never build a building that big and you share that inexperience with the (potential) funding population. They are aware of that and still they support you cus they see a beautiful building in the future where they could live one day. After the major funding phase has ended you see there are problems, big ones. Now you say to the entire community (including the ppl that funded your): "Hey guys! We have overestimated ourselves soooo... We wont make a big building yet, but we will make a house with 10 rooms! You can play there, buuuut... well in order to cover our asses we will charge it as a different project so u dont feel betrayed. Also cus of that cool house we are making your large apartment building will be delayed."
What can we say now? Some can say, well they need to do something, so better something than nothing. Others can say, well its good, ill get a house and an apartment. 3rd party might say, screw you and im off! And many other reactions that i cant be bothered to write here.

I wouldnt care if this game would have been delayed for 5 years if needed due to reasonable situations. But not because you want to make another game (that is similar but totally different).
I signed up for MMO and now i feel bad cus i feel like i lied to a lot of ppl.

Also, having private severs will drag ppl from MMO; well not all of them but even 2% is too much. The MMO needs to be populated as much as possible so we can feel the struggle for space, resources, making a name out of yourself.

I am disappointed so much i didnt want to post anything on this forum. But i feel you need every feedback you can get even if that feedback is based on a distorted perception. I strongly believe my perception isnt distorted.

Anyway, good luck with your 2 games, as if making one game isnt hard enough.

MMO see ya in 15 years or something...


I am truly sorry.... I have read this over and over again, trying desperately to find something positive to say back at you - or even sympathize with you... But I truly failed greatly...
And this rant by myself will be addressed to you and the other haters/whiners out there. I will try my best to keep it calm...

What I am left with is that you clearly do not know how game development works, how crowd funding works, or how donating works.

Not even do you know what to expect with a game still as early in development as this game is - even after 3 years of development... And what still being in development really means.

And the reason is that earlier - just a few years ago, you would not even be a part of this process - as no game developer would include its community in such great aspect OPENLY as we experience today.

And this also gives the gamer/donator/community member a false feeling of the game being allot more further in development than it is - and also demands that the gamer/donator/community member knows more about game development than the normal guy in the street, to even be able to grasp what is going on, and what can be expected by a Dev team.

What you do as a donor is to show you believe in a CONCEPT, and wish to help out to see that concept grow into something more.
But a concept is only that... a rather rough frame to work from to develop something more solid. And the concept WILL change over time... even if the funding is solid from the beginning.
But it will have to change even more if the funding fails in some sort. Even if the end result is the original idea - just with other aspects and ways to get there.

The whole indie concept grew out from people wanting to make the games the big companies did not dare to make - as they often were - and often still are - meant for a niche crowd, that are so specific in their interest in a game, it would most likely not be able to create large box office amounts of cash.
And this is also why so many of them fail...

And this still stands today - even though the indie companies now have allot more going for them, and that the communities really have shown their support in such development teams who dare to tread, still somewhat, uncharted territory.

It has now almost become the NORM that the indie companies/teams create what is really the good games - the immerse ones. The big companies more rely on creating great game engines and a game built on it, but rely on community help, dedicated - freeworking - coders, story writers, 3D artists and animators to really take their product to new heights. And it works!

So do not for one second come and think people are committing a fraud or luring you to pay money for something you will not get here... As you are still getting what you wished for - but you are getting more for it. And everything is still safe and sound within the banner of being a CONCEPT!

It is first when the game is ready for release it seizes to be a concept... then it is a done product.

If you - and this is referring to ANY of the ones that still whine about changes at this point of development with ANY game in development... If you do not grasp this simple concept of what the course of a game in development is, and how crowd funding and donating works - you should NEVER ever again commit yourself to ANY game in development, Early Access, or Beta testing... Cause you have absolutely no place, or the ability to comprehend what is going on at all...

You should then wait til the game is finished - and give your verdict on ONE SOLE thing... what you think of the final PRODUCT!

Sorry for being so blunt... but now this whining is actually starting to piss me off - just a little tad... :D :beer:


Just beautiful, WUNDERBAR!


Siegbert
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 1368
Joined: 02 Nov 2013, 15:15
Location: Germany

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Siegbert » 15 May 2014, 09:13

This thread sounds somehow like one of Daenerys' nick names...

Image

User avatar
Saxxon
 
Posts: 327
Joined: 09 Mar 2014, 20:38

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Saxxon » 15 May 2014, 13:02

Image


Bran34
Beta Tester
 
Posts: 28
Joined: 31 Jan 2014, 06:07

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Bran34 » 16 May 2014, 00:20

Flannery wrote:Lots of Words


Ok, let me make this one simple thing clear to you real quick. This process. The reason we, the people who will play the game later are here? It's to give feedback. We are here to whine if we see something we don't like. That's our job.
Whining about what we think is wrong helps the devs make more informed decisions on what their community wants. That's the whole reason we are involved in the "Development process" that we "have no business whining about".

I believe, sir, that you are the one that doesn't understand the differences between the closed development process of yesteryear and the open development processes that more and more games are embracing today.


Further, I'd still like to push my idea of combining LiF:YO and LiF:MMO into one game and charging server rental fees for YO.


TruePain
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 33
Joined: 16 Feb 2014, 02:56

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by TruePain » 16 May 2014, 00:56

TBH theres no real point in arguing about whether we think this is a good thing or bad thing, the only real way of knowing is to monitor the performance and player base once the game is started. Which leads me to my next thing.

Not saying that this is my opinion, but i have heard many people's confidence in this game begin to lower drastically. Is it because of LIF:YO? I dont know, but for whatever reason, many previously excited donators and testers have become skeptical of this games success rate. Hopefully there is something that can be done to reasure them again.

User avatar
Hodo
True Believer
 
Posts: 471
Joined: 12 Mar 2014, 21:49

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Hodo » 16 May 2014, 15:37

FewTheProud wrote:TBH theres no real point in arguing about whether we think this is a good thing or bad thing, the only real way of knowing is to monitor the performance and player base once the game is started. Which leads me to my next thing.

Not saying that this is my opinion, but i have heard many people's confidence in this game begin to lower drastically. Is it because of LIF:YO? I dont know, but for whatever reason, many previously excited donators and testers have become skeptical of this games success rate. Hopefully there is something that can be done to reasure them again.


You are dead on correct with your statement.

We have a saying in the automotive world, "Talk with your wallet."

If you don't like something, don't buy it.


En_Dotter
 
Posts: 100
Joined: 30 Oct 2013, 01:51

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by En_Dotter » 17 May 2014, 01:41

Flannery wrote:I am truly sorry.... I have read this over and over again, trying desperately to find something positive to say back at you - or even sympathize with you... But I truly failed greatly...
And this rant by myself will be addressed to you and the other haters/whiners out there. I will try my best to keep it calm...

What I am left with is that you clearly do not know how game development works, how crowd funding works, or how donating works.

Not even do you know what to expect with a game still as early in development as this game is - even after 3 years of development... And what still being in development really means.

And the reason is that earlier - just a few years ago, you would not even be a part of this process - as no game developer would include its community in such great aspect OPENLY as we experience today.

And this also gives the gamer/donator/community member a false feeling of the game being allot more further in development than it is - and also demands that the gamer/donator/community member knows more about game development than the normal guy in the street, to even be able to grasp what is going on, and what can be expected by a Dev team.

What you do as a donor is to show you believe in a CONCEPT, and wish to help out to see that concept grow into something more.
But a concept is only that... a rather rough frame to work from to develop something more solid. And the concept WILL change over time... even if the funding is solid from the beginning.
But it will have to change even more if the funding fails in some sort. Even if the end result is the original idea - just with other aspects and ways to get there.

The whole indie concept grew out from people wanting to make the games the big companies did not dare to make - as they often were - and often still are - meant for a niche crowd, that are so specific in their interest in a game, it would most likely not be able to create large box office amounts of cash.
And this is also why so many of them fail...

And this still stands today - even though the indie companies now have allot more going for them, and that the communities really have shown their support in such development teams who dare to tread, still somewhat, uncharted territory.

It has now almost become the NORM that the indie companies/teams create what is really the good games - the immerse ones. The big companies more rely on creating great game engines and a game built on it, but rely on community help, dedicated - freeworking - coders, story writers, 3D artists and animators to really take their product to new heights. And it works!

So do not for one second come and think people are committing a fraud or luring you to pay money for something you will not get here... As you are still getting what you wished for - but you are getting more for it. And everything is still safe and sound within the banner of being a CONCEPT!

It is first when the game is ready for release it seizes to be a concept... then it is a done product.

If you - and this is referring to ANY of the ones that still whine about changes at this point of development with ANY game in development... If you do not grasp this simple concept of what the course of a game in development is, and how crowd funding and donating works - you should NEVER ever again commit yourself to ANY game in development, Early Access, or Beta testing... Cause you have absolutely no place, or the ability to comprehend what is going on at all...

You should then wait til the game is finished - and give your verdict on ONE SOLE thing... what you think of the final PRODUCT!

Sorry for being so blunt... but now this whining is actually starting to piss me off - just a little tad... :D :beer:


First of all i do know how development work. As a part of a big mod project for one of the games i pretty well know how hard it is to be a developer. You might say "that aint a real game... you are just modding.. pfft..." Well this mod is a huge project and has a team of a lot of ppl with certain "jobs".

When ppl comment on the mod i skip all the comments saying "wow this is cool" or "MY GOD WHAT AN AMAZING MOD" and similar. As much as i like to see good comments on the mod im developing (again with a team) i like to see "bad" comments more. Also know and critiques. Some of those are obvious because the person that makes the critique explains it in vivid detail. Others make comments that are not so clear and there are 2 types of those. One is "Your mod sucks" and the other one is "This feature of your mod sucks". For the 1st example there is no way to figure out if anything is wrong with that mod or is it just that that person doesnt like it. But, if someone says that some feature sucks (and doesnt say why), that makes me think. And that is the most valuable information. Why? Because i have to look at that feature in multitude of bad ways i didnt even try before, thus potentially changing/fixing/improving that feature.

As u mentioned concept i gotta say something about that. I did believe in concept and i still do, but im not at all happy with the things going on. Concept is something that can change, but slightly. If u change it a lot then that concept doesnt exist.
For this game my view of concept is the following (in no particular order): open world, craftsmenship (terraforming, building, and so on...), large scale battles, small scale battles, duels?, trade, banditry, diplomacy (which is not gonna be bound (much) by some game rules), MMO. Maybe i skipped some and i apologize if i did. Thats how i see this game. If you remove and/or change any of those you are not getting LiF, you are getting somethign else. Remove large scale battles (sieges for example) and its bullshit (in my eyes). Remove banditry and again its not the same game. Remove MMO (LiF:Yo) and its not the same game.
So concept is the thing that can change during the process but it can change slightly. Imaginary example: "Sorry guys, we know we promised sieges will have max of 1000 players involved, but our servers/engine cant handle that much, so we are lowering it to 500." This is the change of concept but not that severe.

Now about the choice indie devs do what they do. Why they do it? I dont care, because its their own choice, no matter if its gonna be a success or a failure. How much money do they make? I dont care. Its their business not mine. I dont even get the point in comparing companies and justifying their success/failure here. What does that have to do with my post?
Simple - Their job, their problem.
Should i start comparing for example McDonadls and some newly opened burger restaurant and try to justify their choice of food and/or service? How can that do any good?

You, my friend, are using the argumentum verbiosum here to derail the discussion. Seems some of the ppl have taken your bait. I am sure you wanted to express your fondness of this project, but so did i. You defended them, while i attacked them. We have the same goal - for this game to succed. (correct me if im wrong)

Since i want to contribute to this game however i can (at this moment only by posting here and spreading the word) i give my point of view on the changes. Like it or not, but im disappointed and i want LiF to become something we can all play and enjoy it as much as possible.
Image


Siegbert
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 1368
Joined: 02 Nov 2013, 15:15
Location: Germany

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Siegbert » 17 May 2014, 07:30

En_Dotter wrote:Remove large scale battles (sieges for example) and its bullshit (in my eyes). Remove banditry and again its not the same game. Remove MMO (LiF:Yo) and its not the same game


Only, it's not being removed. YO is but an extra. The MMO is still the goal.


Wigster600
 
Posts: 139
Joined: 24 Feb 2014, 14:01
Location: The God's own County! Yorkshire!

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Wigster600 » 17 May 2014, 08:57

I don't see why people are acting like. "ER MAH GERD I SPURTN MAH MUNEH ON DIS AND NAO IZ NOT MAKEHN I WUNT REFUNDEZ!"

It's not over, it's still in developement, even if it might take abit longer, it's in a more stable position with this.
Image

User avatar
Bobik
Project Leader
 
Posts: 1155
Joined: 30 Apr 2011, 15:06

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Bobik » 17 May 2014, 09:23

Siegbert wrote:
En_Dotter wrote:Remove large scale battles (sieges for example) and its bullshit (in my eyes). Remove banditry and again its not the same game. Remove MMO (LiF:Yo) and its not the same game


Only, it's not being removed. YO is but an extra. The MMO is still the goal.


this.
LiF MMO concept is not changed and will not change significantly until I'm leading that project. And I hope it will be for a long time ;) :)
Only difference is that it MIGHT be implemented later, then we've planned.
LiF:YO is another game. In my opinion it is how sandbox nonMMOs should look like. Your own sandbox in your backyard, where you can invite your friends and build castles, fight wars and so on. It is not one huge public beach with a sand, where some passing by punk can crush your castle simply for fun and you need to defend your piece of creativity with your fists daily and nightly.

Personally I like Sandbox MMO concept more, I've been raised by such type of games - UO, SB, DF, EVE. But I also understand and like idea of private sandbox where your creativity is not in danger of gameplay politics and diplomacy and you can play it simply for fun, to make some screenshots and vids of astonishing castles/mazes/cities/landscapes that you had created in that sandbox.

So instead of being a dog in the manger, let's be positive to that new opportunity for other players to experience LiF sandboxiness in that way, because otherwise they would not even dare to venture into Full Loot Free PvP sandbox MMORPG.


Bran34
Beta Tester
 
Posts: 28
Joined: 31 Jan 2014, 06:07

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Bran34 » 18 May 2014, 03:49

I just hope this doesn't take away players from the MMO. You're right, though, bobik.

However, I'd still like to suggest charging server rentals for YO instead of distributing the server files, and making YO itself either included in MMO or F2P.


Hugolin
 
Posts: 1
Joined: 19 Mar 2014, 04:57

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Hugolin » 18 May 2014, 08:01

wow what a let down, i was thinking about buying pre order or something, but i already have rust to play on private servers, sad.


Wigster600
 
Posts: 139
Joined: 24 Feb 2014, 14:01
Location: The God's own County! Yorkshire!

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Wigster600 » 18 May 2014, 09:44

Hugolin wrote:wow what a let down, i was thinking about buying pre order or something, but i already have rust to play on private servers, sad.


Not sure if not read a few posts above him... or just taking the piss....
Image

User avatar
Arrakis
 
Posts: 5453
Joined: 25 Oct 2013, 14:11
Location: Space

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Arrakis » 18 May 2014, 09:54

Wigster600 wrote:
Hugolin wrote:wow what a let down, i was thinking about buying pre order or something, but i already have rust to play on private servers, sad.


Not sure if not read a few posts above him... or just taking the piss....


Image


Destlocke
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 21 Mar 2014, 23:43

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Destlocke » 20 May 2014, 12:37

This is a terrible idea overall. The big selling points of this game is the open world, and that it's actually MASSIVE. More and more games are leaning towards small servers and INSTANCES, which I have no interest in.

LIF: YO is basically an instance. LIF is a world, give it time to be realized as one. This might give you guys a short-sighted shot to the arm money-wise to make you feel better today, but at the cost of a long term cure most certainly.

And telling people the MMO is still coming is not reassuring. Trying to make an MMO is very difficult as you well know; trying to make 2 at the same time is just silly.

Most people will view this as "another one bites the dust.."


Added » 20 May 2014, 14:42



Bobik wrote:this.
LiF MMO concept is not changed and will not change significantly until I'm leading that project. And I hope it will be for a long time ;) :)
Only difference is that it MIGHT be implemented later, then we've planned.



Time IS change in the games industry, especially one that is so starved of quality MMOs at this point. We need a game like LiF as soon as it can be made, not "some time later" after another project that we most certainly aren't in need of. (small scale, small server, etc)

Image
Last edited by Destlocke on 20 May 2014, 12:45, edited 1 time in total.


Perpetualgamer
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 01 Dec 2013, 03:08

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Perpetualgamer » 20 May 2014, 21:05

Destlocke wrote:Time IS change in the games industry, especially one that is so starved of quality MMOs at this point. We need a game like LiF as soon as it can be made, not "some time later" after another project that we most certainly aren't in need of. (small scale, small server, etc)


Time != Change, that is a very bad argument to make and is surrounded by hyperbole. If you want quality then go play Wurm Online temporarily, this game is basically that but with an upgrade in the graphics department(a much needed upgrade for sure). But to say that there is no Quality MMO's at this point is a huge amount of hyperbole.

That being said Rust made me aware that LiF:YO will be filling a hole, that needs filling. A robust survival medevil game that I can play with my close friends without getting harassed by the big guilds. That being said I will also be playing LiF: MMO albeit alone, because my friends will never get into it like I will.

I wonder how many man hours Bobik has spent reading the complains and hyperbole in this forum that could have been spent progressing the game forward. He isn't going to change his decision, which means that any arguments we have on the subject will basically just be stuff he has to read and respond. It's a waste of the poor mans time.


Beeskee
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 47
Joined: 23 Mar 2014, 06:54

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Beeskee » 21 May 2014, 05:09

BTW devs if you're having trouble with zoning, the source for OpenSim is available. Can't remember if I posted this or not. It doesn't hurt to take a peak, may give you some insight by seeing how they handle things.

I can't think of any other open source MMOs with zoning, if anyone else can, feel free to post your suggestions. :D

User avatar
Hodo
True Believer
 
Posts: 471
Joined: 12 Mar 2014, 21:49

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Hodo » 22 May 2014, 16:26

Perpetualgamer wrote:
Destlocke wrote:Time IS change in the games industry, especially one that is so starved of quality MMOs at this point. We need a game like LiF as soon as it can be made, not "some time later" after another project that we most certainly aren't in need of. (small scale, small server, etc)


Time != Change, that is a very bad argument to make and is surrounded by hyperbole. If you want quality then go play Wurm Online temporarily, this game is basically that but with an upgrade in the graphics department(a much needed upgrade for sure). But to say that there is no Quality MMO's at this point is a huge amount of hyperbole.

That being said Rust made me aware that LiF:YO will be filling a hole, that needs filling. A robust survival medevil game that I can play with my close friends without getting harassed by the big guilds. That being said I will also be playing LiF: MMO albeit alone, because my friends will never get into it like I will.

I wonder how many man hours Bobik has spent reading the complains and hyperbole in this forum that could have been spent progressing the game forward. He isn't going to change his decision, which means that any arguments we have on the subject will basically just be stuff he has to read and respond. It's a waste of the poor mans time.



This game will not be like Wurm Online, that grind is stupid.


Unbeaten
Zealous Believer
 
Posts: 124
Joined: 23 May 2014, 06:28

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Unbeaten » 23 May 2014, 06:36

I agree, this is DFUW all over again. The old bait and switch technique to get green lit and gather support. THEN we change the concept in a whole 180 degree fashion into some dumb system most wont even care to learn. Your asking us to work harder than the dev's obviously are in their thinktank this morning.


Kossako
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 174
Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 04:37
Location: Poland

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Kossako » 23 May 2014, 07:38

Unbeaten wrote:I agree, this is DFUW all over again. The old bait and switch technique to get green lit and gather support. THEN we change the concept in a whole 180 degree fashion into some dumb system most wont even care to learn. Your asking us to work harder than the dev's obviously are in their thinktank this morning.


Yeah... I though same. I already heard "this is only side project" and "won't affect main game development at all" from Aventurine. Partially lost interest but waiting to see how it goes.
Skills and crafting information: lif-database-application-t1494

Build your first home for newbies guide: first-house-guide-to-new-players-t1432


Flesh
Alpha Tester
 
Posts: 31
Joined: 10 Feb 2014, 15:40

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Flesh » 24 May 2014, 14:52

Kossako wrote:
Unbeaten wrote:I agree, this is DFUW all over again. The old bait and switch technique to get green lit and gather support. THEN we change the concept in a whole 180 degree fashion into some dumb system most wont even care to learn. Your asking us to work harder than the dev's obviously are in their thinktank this morning.


Yeah... I though same. I already heard "this is only side project" and "won't affect main game development at all" from Aventurine. Partially lost interest but waiting to see how it goes.


Bobik have clearly said that LiF YO will take time from the MMO development. No attempt to hide the fact. This dev-team is honest with their thoughts and work. You can't even compare them with AV on that.

That being said, if LiF YO becomes a success -> Money -> More Devs -> shorter development time on the MMO version. Maybe.

User avatar
Bobik
Project Leader
 
Posts: 1155
Joined: 30 Apr 2011, 15:06

Re: Change of plans feedback

Post by Bobik » 25 May 2014, 12:55

Even few months or years of development is infinitely shorter then "never".

Return to General Discussion