Are you ignoring Epleland?

General discussion about Life is Feudal MMO and Life is Feudal: Your Own, The main section and backbone of the forums.

Raxkin
 
Posts: 3
Joined: 28 Jan 2018, 13:12

Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Raxkin » 16 Mar 2018, 19:19

Image

Image

How can you say that you made a decision based on a poll of Avalon and don't make a decision on Epleland when it get's more support(Not looking the number of votes, we all know that there is more population on Avalon)

User avatar
Belgarath
 
Posts: 11
Joined: 09 Dec 2017, 15:32

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Belgarath » 16 Mar 2018, 19:20

+1
Belgarath Embid King of La Guardia Real

Image


Asier1500
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 09 Jan 2018, 22:35

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Asier1500 » 16 Mar 2018, 19:22

+1 Hello DEVs. Epleland is here!

User avatar
Parraman
 
Posts: 44
Joined: 08 Jan 2018, 17:15

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Parraman » 16 Mar 2018, 21:43

GM ignores The people that pays for The Game in Epleland. They just ese Avalon gamers
Parra, Antiguo Maestre Alquimista de la Guardia Real de Epleland, Cronista y Cartografo de la Guardia Real de SoonLand

Image

User avatar
Nazeef
 
Posts: 116
Joined: 10 Dec 2017, 02:09

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Nazeef » 16 Mar 2018, 21:58

+
Epleland has an extremely unsuccessful ruleset and everything becomes only worse day by day. It will be empty after character transfer implementation, because RP-PvP players will leave to PvP servers and RP-PvE players just leave game because they will be bored.
Image

User avatar
HolyAvengerOne
 
Posts: 299
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 08:45

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by HolyAvengerOne » 16 Mar 2018, 23:04

OP : just give it a moment, I'm sure they're looking into that as well.

Edit: you should link the threads in your post.
Lord Fyrr Deerd'an | Pope of Riftwood, a division of Lux Astra Sanctorum [LAST] | Buyan (NA-E)



Vard
 
Posts: 6
Joined: 21 Dec 2017, 18:32

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Vard » 17 Mar 2018, 01:30

Nazeef wrote:+
Epleland has an extremely unsuccessful ruleset and everything becomes only worse day by day. It will be empty after character transfer implementation, because RP-PvP players will leave to PvP servers and RP-PvE players just leave game because they will be bored.


This...

exactly...


Yayohegel
 
Posts: 34
Joined: 19 Nov 2016, 13:35

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Yayohegel » 17 Mar 2018, 14:24

It's a shame, Avalon reverts the IB system with 79% of the votes in favor. Epleland does not do it with 95%. This is the case they make to the community, simply shameful. You have sold us one thing and you are giving us a different one that has a name: fraud.
Yayo Hegel General de la Guardia Real

Image

User avatar
Lord_Barton
True Believer
 
Posts: 20
Joined: 20 Jul 2017, 20:20

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Lord_Barton » 17 Mar 2018, 14:27

CHANGE PLEASE to 10 tiles for the love of god ^^
Image

User avatar
Bhron_Raknarok
 
Posts: 1
Joined: 07 Dec 2017, 22:25

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Bhron_Raknarok » 17 Mar 2018, 17:15

Dear devs, I do not understand why you have taken these measures, and because in Avalon you have returned to the totem of 10 tiles and in Epleland, not when in Epleland you have a higher percentage than Avalon.
Explain to me that the small totem is useful, because if you take away 2.5 tiles and each day retrieve 3, this does not have any sense. With the totem of 10 tiles it is already hard to reduce the claim, both in time and in economic cost. With the new patch of 5 tiles it is unfeasible to assault any guild, and although this is a role server, but in real life there are wars due to disagreements and political or economic problems, and it would have to be implemented as in Avalon. I hope you take the matter seriously, because if it does not make sense to play in your magnificent game, and the only thing you're going to get is that people stop playing Life is Feudal. Regards, Bhron Rakanarok.
Bhron Raknarok "Count of Kategatt"

Image

User avatar
Arrakis
 
Posts: 5455
Joined: 25 Oct 2013, 14:11
Location: Space

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Arrakis » 17 Mar 2018, 20:44

Please, remember that Avalon is the ONLY world that is branded as a world with PvP ruleset. This is why it will retain higher IB loss penalty.

User avatar
Parraman
 
Posts: 44
Joined: 08 Jan 2018, 17:15

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Parraman » 17 Mar 2018, 21:33

Arrakis wrote:Please, remember that Avalon is the ONLY world that is branded as a world with PvP ruleset. This is why it will retain higher IB loss penalty.


No Arrakis, we started the game in a server PVP/Roleplay (Epleland) and you changed it trowght the time to a PVE/Roleplay. we entered to a type of server and you are changed it all. The comunity is talking and you are ingnoring us.

if you want a PVE server create another or dont allaw attack betwen characters and create NPC's and we leave the game definetelly
Parra, Antiguo Maestre Alquimista de la Guardia Real de Epleland, Cronista y Cartografo de la Guardia Real de SoonLand

Image


Yayohegel
 
Posts: 34
Joined: 19 Nov 2016, 13:35

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Yayohegel » 17 Mar 2018, 21:41

Arrakis wrote:Please, remember that Avalon is the ONLY world that is branded as a world with PvP ruleset. This is why it will retain higher IB loss penalty.

Ok, Epleland is a PVE server? Eliminate the damage between players. No one can attack anyone, get AI with NPC. Where is the E of PVE? This is simply absurd. You allow dirty war to be waged, but you do not favor honorable war or instantiated battles. Ridiculous. I am sorry.
Yayo Hegel General de la Guardia Real

Image

User avatar
Nazeef
 
Posts: 116
Joined: 10 Dec 2017, 02:09

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Nazeef » 17 Mar 2018, 22:10

Arrakis wrote:Please, remember that Avalon is the ONLY world that is branded as a world with PvP ruleset. This is why it will retain higher IB loss penalty.

The thing is we never asked for these changes - we waited for long time for meaningful IBs and were happy when they were implemented. And as soon as we started to enjoy the war, devs took everything away - as far as I know, because of the Chinese on NA servers. If they were experiencing problems, it was necessary to apply new rules to their server, not to all servers at once, that's my point.
Image


Zerick
 
Posts: 1
Joined: 18 May 2017, 10:49

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Zerick » 17 Mar 2018, 22:35

Arrakis wrote:Please, remember that Avalon is the ONLY world that is branded as a world with PvP ruleset. This is why it will retain higher IB loss penalty.


This situation must be fixed or Epleland will die. A week ago the server population was 1100 people, now it does not reach 900 people and going down.

PvP is implemented on all servers, the pvp is not just the judment hour. It is impossible to have pve servers when the part of the environment doesn't exist. There are no NPCs. There are not multiple cities distributed by the map with which to interact. There is no quest. So I don't understand what is for you the pve but this game isn't made to do pve, for that I'm going to any other game where if you can do pve without any problem, but it's not what I want.

If you want Epleland IB penalty to be 5 tiles, go ahead, but the totems should cost half or at least when there is a war against an enemy, that they can't recover the claim. Siege totems, siege ladders and other siege tools should also be implemented. All this is as necessary for the Roleplay as any other facet of the game.

I hope this situation is solved as soon as possible.

A greeting.

-----------------------
Esta situación deber arreglarse o al servidor de Epleland le quedan los días contados. Hace una semana la población del servidor era de 1100 personas, ahora no llega a las 900 personas y bajando.

El PvP está implementado en todos los servidores, el pvp no es solo la hora del juicio. Es imposible que haya servidores pve cuando no existe la parte del entorno. No hay NPCs, no existen multiples ciudades distribuidas por el mapa con las que interactuar, no hay quest, asi que no entiendo que es para ustedes el pve pero este juego no está hecho para hacer pve, para eso me voy a cualquier otro juego dónde si se puede hacer pve sin ningún problema, pero no es lo que quiero.

Si quereis que el penalizador en Epleland sea de 5 casillas, adelante, pero los totems deberían costar la mitad o al menos cuando haya una guerra contra un enemigo que ellos no puedan recuperar el claim. También deberían implementarse los totems de asedio, escalas de asedio y otras herramientas de asedio. Todo esto es tan necesario para el Roleplay como cualquier otra faceta del juego.

Espero que esta situación se solucione cuanto antes.

Un saludo.

User avatar
HolyAvengerOne
 
Posts: 299
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 08:45

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by HolyAvengerOne » 18 Mar 2018, 04:06

Nazeef wrote:
Arrakis wrote:Please, remember that Avalon is the ONLY world that is branded as a world with PvP ruleset. This is why it will retain higher IB loss penalty.

The thing is we never asked for these changes - we waited for long time for meaningful IBs and were happy when they were implemented. And as soon as we started to enjoy the war, devs took everything away - as far as I know, because of the Chinese on NA servers. If they were experiencing problems, it was necessary to apply new rules to their server, not to all servers at once, that's my point.


Same thing for Buyan, lots of us did not agree with the initial changes to make it easier, softer pvp.

That's why we're having a vote : post145806/
Lord Fyrr Deerd'an | Pope of Riftwood, a division of Lux Astra Sanctorum [LAST] | Buyan (NA-E)



Emilioike
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 19 Dec 2017, 13:09

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Emilioike » 18 Mar 2018, 13:18

Revert!
Hear from players or Epeland is doomed... not going to Avalon or else, just leaving.

You are starting to create a snowball effect to leave Epeland, well done!!! :beer:


Redmantle
 
Posts: 86
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 01:12

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Redmantle » 18 Mar 2018, 14:56

Who actually wants Epleland to be carebear central pve? Cos non of the players seem to xD We're all getting sick of not being able to prosecute wars properly. An RP server where wars never end isent RP, its some s** cowboys and indians game where we fight then get back up again and everyone is fine. Only way to win a war is to drive a guild off of the game and noone wants that.

Just make a pve server for people that want a safespace to erp in peace. RP server should not mean safezone.

User avatar
HolyAvengerOne
 
Posts: 299
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 08:45

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by HolyAvengerOne » 18 Mar 2018, 16:23

Redmantle wrote:Who actually wants Epleland to be carebear central pve?


Probably Bobik, for his incognito atl :P :crazy:
Lord Fyrr Deerd'an | Pope of Riftwood, a division of Lux Astra Sanctorum [LAST] | Buyan (NA-E)



Redmantle
 
Posts: 86
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 01:12

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Redmantle » 19 Mar 2018, 00:45

Seriously though you cant model the dynamic power relationships of tennant manorial system/feudal system in a RP sense in an open world without real reprecussions behind actions. Hence we need judgement hour and a REAL result from IB wins. Just lock a longer cooldown on IBing the same target (can still hit allies and vassals) but make them loose 10-15-20 tiles in a loose. Hell maybe add to that a longer required time between placing the totem and fighting it. Pitched battles were very very very very rare (especially in regards to France/Britain) in 10th/11th/12th/early 13th century Europe, reflect that in making them something people think a bit harder about, gear up for for longer etc. etc but that have more devasting consequences to loosing.


Papagelos
 
Posts: 29
Joined: 02 Dec 2017, 19:10

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Papagelos » 20 Mar 2018, 06:18

Those numbers are not reliable....

Persons (say 3000) that are happy in Eppleland sees poll "revert IB changes", thinks "nah, im very happy with eppleland" and does not even go into the post. 30 go in just coz they can think a bit further and dont want the "other side" to win.

Persons unhappy with Eppleland (say 300), see poll, go FUCK YEAH! and go in and vote.

Result: 300 unhappy, 30 happy.
Reality: 3000 happy. 300 unhappy-

User avatar
Tashka
 
Posts: 227
Joined: 02 Dec 2017, 17:00

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Tashka » 20 Mar 2018, 09:35

Papagelos wrote:Those numbers are not reliable....

Persons (say 3000) that are happy in Eppleland sees poll "revert IB changes", thinks "nah, im very happy with eppleland" and does not even go into the post. 30 go in just coz they can think a bit further and dont want the "other side" to win.

Persons unhappy with Eppleland (say 300), see poll, go FUCK YEAH! and go in and vote.

Result: 300 unhappy, 30 happy.
Reality: 3000 happy. 300 unhappy-


There's an option to say you're happy. JH poll shows people are happy with no JH (unfortunately) so i don't think these polls are biased or inaccurate.
Shadow queen, tyrant, crooked whore, bloody goddess, Princess of Verna, self-proclaimed Queen in Kingdom of the North (Epleland)

Books for the people! - a client mod to let you write books and messages

User avatar
Hodo
 
Posts: 649
Joined: 08 Dec 2017, 23:17

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Hodo » 20 Mar 2018, 12:30

Arrakis wrote:Please, remember that Avalon is the ONLY world that is branded as a world with PvP ruleset. This is why it will retain higher IB loss penalty.


So let me guess the North American servers can go kick rocks then?

Well FU too, and I dont mean Feudal Union.
Don't build what you can't defend- Rule number 1.


Redmantle
 
Posts: 86
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 01:12

Re: Are you ignoring Epleland?

Post by Redmantle » 21 Mar 2018, 12:19

Bobbik knows you yanks are terrible at warfare and thus made your server more carebeary, just like in his infinite wisdom he knows us roleplayers cant pvp ;p

Return to General Discussion