Hodo wrote:The question is, HOW did you explain to this person they were wrong?
I explained the philosophical point around the usage of the comment he made. Where his usage was not accurate based on systems that exist in all societies, and by his comment, he is also saying that anything can be done to him by some real world authority.
And I elaborated that his comment would justify actions that would be considered to be an abuse of power based on what is considered a fair exchange of goods and services for some money.
I guy was complaining and his comment was the game does not need the guy anyways, and that every player has to take it or leave it.
That is the wrong information exchange model to support the game, that is the wrong conclusion of what a service for fee model is, and it opens the door for actions to be taken against some players to drive them away because they don't fit a mold, while in truth, just like a hedge fund, complainers are a good information source and push back, and if some people arn't complaining then the game is not challenging enough.
The other time, A guy wanted my opinion on communism, to bait me into an off topic conversation, so I told him I have no experience with that, I only know of the system of economic central control by corporations, fascism, that is in place in the USA to limit prosperity and control society by suppressing production, and when he said I need to stop being poor, I told them I would, when I am paid what I am due.
So in both cases I made an annoying argument to answer a question to someone that was making a comment to me, and requesting an answer. Because the first step to forced submission is for someone to be forced to not be able to reply to a challenging assertion against them or put to them.