I figure the answer is probably pretty obvious, but I thought I'd toss it out there. I'll be out of pocket on Saturday and some of Sunday, but I know a bunch of SSR guys will be around looking for some PvP. Radison and company should be popping into your server for the world PvP coordination.
I challenge the rest of the guilds and other players here to jump onto ATS's TeamSpeak 3 server and get to know some future movers and shakers in the LiF community.
We may end up as enemies in LiF, but there isn't any reason we should be enemies in ESO while we wait especially with the open beta invites going out.
Daggerfall Covenant for ATS and SSR this weekend. Check the guild listing for ATS's TS3 info or I'm sure one of them will be along shortly to post it up. I don't like giving out other people's info unsolicited!
Yes we have a public 500 slot TS3 specifically for ESO PvP, the goal is to get an entire campaigns pop into it in some form or another. Max pop per alliance will be around 500 people. You can find the info in our thread in the recruitment section.
Were not looking to recruit 500 people. The goal is to get pvpers of all sizes in so we can be useful as a whole. Solo pvper, small group of friends or a large clan you can all get set up and in your own channel. Your not forced to join a massive raid. We just want to be able to communicate effectively to achieve objectives.
I'm sure many people have had times when there like WTF is my team doing? Hopefully we can eliminate that.
I keep having this reoccurring thought about LiF maybe you guys could help with. Apparently being the predominantly large guilds on the server we could facilitate this. Would be cool when the dust settles with testing and what not to set up a north vrs south war. Anyone interested in testing large scale fights could pick between the north or the south and just battle it out.
Obviously the main goal would be to test things. I think there is barley enough population to pull off a solid two sided war so we would need to see a lot of people step up. Hell even our guild names seem to conflict;) like you said on a previous post.. This could be a good way to get some good video for the public.
I think the main point is that we set up conflict on purpose, but still have channels and mediums through which we can communicate to cut out the metagaming to create a better environment that makes the game more fun.
We don't need to pre arrange or preschedule battles unless we want to set up specific dates to really push a lot of people into one area. I REALLY want to see an actual geopolitical landscape develop in the game where we fight over geopolitical reasons and not bullshit forum comments or simply because our collective butthurt is showing.
In the next day or so I'm going to push out a concept of a League of guilds that will serve as a way for us to have a common place to meet and chat to arrange events and mediate conflict, but also to purposely generate PvP opportunities and build legitimate reasons to go to war to ensure activity stays high.
Proximo wrote:So what's the difference between a league of guilds and a Kingdom?
A league of guilds would be a voluntary medium for dialogue and a Kingdom can be any number of things from something similar to a highly centralized system of control and organization.
Krevente wrote:Check your sources again. We were there. It was an absolutely shitshow in the RvR.
Correct on Both fronts. Latency and lag made it unplayable both Saturday and Sunday for most people. Hopefully they get that sorted out. We had some good fights though. a couple 9v40/50+ took em 6 minutes to wipe us completely.