Sharana wrote:Cool down m8. Everyone is free to vote here, everyone was invited to vote. if you think the community is so big ... you are playing other LiF.
A poll (about the new skilltrees so more important for everyone) posted by Bobik himself collected 400-500 votes. In such case 170 and growing is a lot of active population, because everyone know that only part of the player actually care enough to vote usually.
So where is everyone that is against and didn't vote already?
Degoyl wrote:Filipsss wrote:Degoyl wrote:128 players??? you think its the MAJORITY of players??? you think the opinion of your 128 people is enough for something to be changed? what the hell is going on, people??? the blood pact and some french guys voted YES, then it means, that it should certainly be implemented? then the question comes - is this game is made for the blood pact? total dissapointment...
No, but apparently blood pact is only one who cares about game development
Ah, so the actual point of view of the blood pact is here? Everyone else, who bought this game, who waits for years until release, spends money on beta packs, buys even more then 3 or 5 packs at the same time, makes videos about bugs, posts threads in suggestions section... They dont care. THE BLOOD PACT cares. Sounds like: "Everyone calm down. Whatever you did, actually, you dont care about the game as much as blood pact cares. So, leave everything to them. They know better what the game needs." Well, thats arrogance, friends. Its like the guys befriended a gm on a server, and think they are the boss here.
If you have established a contact with the devs, it does not mean at all that you automatically become the voice of the community. You better understand it, or people will start hating you, because you usurp their right to have their own opinion.
And for sure, next time you write something like this, you better think about how people will react on such statements.
Filipsss wrote:
You: "FAK U BP oppressors, THIS ISN'T YOUR GAME, YOU CAN'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO, REEEEEE, *autistic screeching continues*"
Filipsss wrote:Degoyl wrote:128 players??? you think its the MAJORITY of players??? you think the opinion of your 128 people is enough for something to be changed? what the hell is going on, people??? the blood pact and some french guys voted YES, then it means, that it should certainly be implemented? then the question comes - is this game is made for the blood pact? total dissapointment...
No, but apparently blood pact is only one who cares about game development
Rusery wrote:However, these waves arent about fair play, they are about stability and mechanics testing -- so the point here is completely moot.
There has been plenty of battles, lots of successful raids, log outs and failed encounters. All of this is good and valuable data. If you want to comment, try adding something meaningful next time.
Sharana wrote:Rusery wrote:However, these waves arent about fair play, they are about stability and mechanics testing -- so the point here is completely moot.
There has been plenty of battles, lots of successful raids, log outs and failed encounters. All of this is good and valuable data. If you want to comment, try adding something meaningful next time.
It's not about fairplay? Then there was no need to remove the switching of datafiles to get a daylight during nights for example - we can test better during daylight by that logic. And other serious exploits that I won't mention.
Battles, raids - valuable data? You are badly misinformed then, if that was the goal there would have been JH at the very least. We also asked when will be the best time to organise big battle (both sides know in advance, prepare them self and meet in almost empty server) so that they are prepared to generate logs on server load and so on - the answer was please don't, we are not at this point yet and that won't help us.
Also the only PvP they will gather data from to balance in the future will be the instanced battles - all that what we did for fun brings them absolutely nothing nor they really care about it. That's the reality and it's more then logical. Stability and general playability are more important.
The new skilltree we got was more about feedback and it can be properly tested when it hits YO.
Popers wrote:I think the point here is that people count should stay for closed beta test.
Sharana wrote:We strongly hope that you will take the results seriously independent of the outcome.
That's the reason Bobik said fine, we will remove the counters. Feudal democracy
Sharana wrote:It's not about fairplay? Then there was no need to remove the switching of datafiles to get a daylight during nights for example - we can test better during daylight by that logic. And other serious exploits that I won't mention.